I am somewhat confused! Why is there such a hullabaloo over what Foreign Minister A K Momen said recently in Chattagram to his targeted Hindu audience? Has he said anything wrong or different from what goes on between Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s Bangladesh and India? Everyone in Dhaka knows about the Hasina-India Entente and that Hasina and her Awami government cannot survive without their master’s blessings.
Some media houses guardedly castigated Momen’s “leak” of the truth, more as an exercise in damage control, or protecting their bread provider. The Daily Star’s Mahfuz Anam, Syed Badrul Ahsan and a few others quickly jumped in to shield “our Prime Minister,” who, they tried to assert, was as clean as a Persian carpet. “She is the Prime Minister on her own,” they seemed to insist. “No India, no Moeenuddin-Fakhruddin, no Sujatha Singh, no brick-n-sand trucks, no Midnight Elections.” Sweeping the dust under the carpet! One can only feel pity for them.
Yes, Mr. Momen violated the not so “Privacy Agreement” within the Hasina administration. The crime he committed was to take sole credit for checking that Hasina’s life-bird was safe in New Delhi’s cage. That, I think was the heartburn for Obaidul Kader and other Awami brats. “Do you think we have been going to New Delhi to measure the height of the Qutub Minar?” their retort seems to convey.
The disoriented, undiplomatic top diplomat and yet a gleeful Momen is not sure if he is to blow hot or cold in his post “privacy breach.” Strangely, we hear nothing from the Prime Minister, nor her office. She is perhaps in a dilemma: doomed if she owns the facts, doomed if she doesn’t. The situation in New Delhi is the same.
Professor Taj Hashmi, a Research Scholar, writes in an article published in the South Asia Journal and the Aequitas Review on August 22, 2022 that India will not help Hasina this time. I find it difficult to digest. He brings the China issue to prove his point. We know Hasina seeks hard cash and large investments from Beijing that her sponsors cannot provide. I believe the arrangement has their tacit approval, because it serves the purpose of all three parties.
Professor Ali Riaz of the Illinois State University believes so. Of course, when the protégé oversteps the boundary with such projects as Teesta and port developments, it needs to give plenty of explanations, pleasant or unpleasant. To me, the China card is a hoax, a political stunt to the Chanakyas, as well as to the Americans. I think both know it well. China, which includes Hong Kong, is India’s second largest trading partner and their mutual trade amounts to more than $100 billion, 65% of which is in Beijing’s favor. The US-China trade amounts to half a trillion dollars in business, despite all the rhetoric.
I also believe that the India-Hasina relationship is stronger than Momen’s “husband-wife” analogy. We have seen this over the past one and a half decades, if not more. Sheikh Hasina was intensely tutored by the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), India’s external intelligence agency, during her six years of self-exile in 1975-81 in the country on how to run the show when she would be placed in power. The syllabi included the elimination of President Ziaur Rahman, judicial murders of August 15 leaders and Islamist leaders, destruction of the opposition, silencing the people with bullets, batons, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings under the harsh Digital Security Act (DSA). Meanwhile, the Hasina government threw a few bones to Bangladeshis in the name of “development”.
Sheikh Hasina allowed the free use of Bangladeshi territory for India’s geo-political and economic benefits, augmenting the minority (8%) Hindu community, Indianizing Muslim Bangladesh by implementing Hindu ideology and culture in the name of secularism. All are one-sided deals. The only return for Hasina is the throne. She surrendered South Talpatti, allowed Indian surveillance on its coast and cannot protest Fellani’s murder. The Teesta and all other shared rivers dry up in winter, but she remains silent no matter what the master does to its Muslim citizens, even though the whole world condemns them. Let’s recall that the Home Minister of India called Bangladeshis “termites“.
Dr. Hashmi argues that helping Hasina at this juncture will be “extremely embarrassing for India as that would make India a hegemonic state.” Has India not been so thus far? At least from January 1, 2007 when General Moeen Uddin was baited to betray? Has it not been known to all? True, of late, geopolitical dynamics have changed considerably but I doubt that has made much difference in the Indo-Bangla matrimony.
Without going much into details, my hunch is:
1. Hasina will not quit easily. She has a definite fear of falling. Till now, she has little challenge to her authority. Please read http://southasiajournal.net/bangladesh-sheikh-hasinas-fear-of-fall-is-the-issue/
2. India will not abandon Hasina. New Delhi has no alternative to Hasina to serve its interests so obligingly.
It is only the People’s Power that can bring the desired change for the better. And, to unite the people for such a common cause, inspiring leadership is needed. The only Party that could make a difference, the BNP, is lost and disoriented because of misleading and misdirection at the top. The problem is not with Mirzas and Fakhruls. The rumored 200–100 compromise for the next election will be a national betrayal. Patriotic and nationalist elements of the Party and followers of the ideology of Ziaur Rahman should resist any such anti-people conspiracy with the illegal fascists.
“The people have the power. All we need to do is awaken the power of the people,”—John Lennon
*The writer is a freedom fighter and an activist of democracy, human rights and freedom. He has published a few books on his own and jointly published about half a dozen.
August 24, 2022
The viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, viewpoints and editorial policies of Aequitas Review.
